Thursday, December 27, 2018

'War and Peace\r'

'1310 10/17/12 contend War is inevit equal when disasters exist, further suffer several(prenominal)times be avoidable when contrast over cultural matters. Primarily, it is in piece’s best interest to interpret for himself and his family. Those be his two biggest priorities. When any genial of disaster occurs, he essential primary look after himself and his family before ensuring the preventative of some others. A civilization works in the same way. Its aspiration is to carry proscribed the way of life of the plenty and control that it withstands. It will fail to r all(prenominal) that ending if the people in the civilization atomic number 18n’t willing to fight for themselves and what they believe in.If some kind of inbred calamity strikes or an outside power that is willing to buck moves in and savagely forces its own laws, traditions, and customs, the people moldiness cover appropriate actions or face the downfall of their own kind. They must fight to preserve their customs and traditions, or move to another place to live. straight off if the intruding invader has any connect for the people, but still desires to enforce their laws upon them, non- force out earth-closet be customd. Non-violence backside only be an alternative to war if the force they are contend against is non- slam-bang.Otherwise, it will only desexualize trampled upon by a violent, oppressive force. In order for a civilization to survive, it must energise an adequate supply of resources for its people. A civilization’s supply of resources clear easily be depleted by drought, famine, floods, disease and more other natural disasters. When this happens, the civilization must key out a way to solve this problem. If a consequence can’t be base while staying in the area, they must find another place to live, but that comes with risks. termination out and searching for a newly place is very dangerous and many people may die.Anoth er option the destitute separate of people might take would be to seek help to a nearby but separate establishment. This puts the assay radical in the hands of the salutary one. It is then up to the healthy group to decide if they are going to contribution their resources or deny it to them. The denial of aide-de-camp will displease the struggling group and they might curb to turn to violence to protect their people. This is because no compromise can be made and twain groups are looking out for themselves. Humanity’s natural instinct o survive is the primary reason why violent wars are inevitable. As I render point outed before, a civilization’s goal is to do anything they can to ensure the bump and survival of their culture. The Crusades of the middle-ages are a hone example of acting out on this cultural pride. In 1071, the Catholic perform had previously lost access of the set apart Lands to the Turks. They make a comeback in 1095, at the main series of the Crusades. A lot of conflict and fighting occurred at this time and lasted until 1291.Due to the reason they were fighting, war could give way easily been avoidable. The Christians and the Muslims weren’t necessarily fighting for resources, but for the right to own the consecrate Lands. The reason both religions wanted it was because both had ties to it. Since they weren’t fighting for resources, they should have been able to share the land without bloodshed. Both should have been able to exist with each other without conflict. Non-violence can be an alternative to war, but only if the people’s lives are a factor in the opposing force’s power.When the British were arbitrary their colonies in India, they were imposing taxes and trade. The British were using India for its own economic benefits. If the British started killing off the Indians, then there wouldn’t be anybody to pay them their taxes, not to mention it could start a war uncompl ete party could afford or want. tear down if the British decided to get violent against the resistance, non-violence would have still been effective. This is because the British would use violence to induce fear, but at a cost.Since the British economy is mutualist on the population of the people, they would actually pervert themselves if they were to kill. When people are faced with the options to each fight or die because of contention over resources, they will chose to fight and war will occur. Some wars and conflicts in the medieval could have been avoided because both parties were intolerant of each other but wanted the same land. In this case, conflict should never have happened, and compromise should have been the solution.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment