'Morality and Obligation Essay\r'

'1. Two preliminary steps taken, that whitethorn be necessary, before one send packing intui? vely calculate the decentlyness of an ac? on are cerebration fully about the consequences of an ac? on. In separate words, think before you bout. Also give eyeshot (considera? on) to the persons involved in said ac? on or your rela? on(ship) with the persons involved. 2. An ac? on is considered honourablely candid in addi? on to being right when it is the right thing to do, while also stemming from a dear(p) place. When the person or â€Å"agent” performs said movement because it is right, from a feeling of obliga?\r\non, a morally nigh venture as is also right. 3. According to Prichard, an ac? on make from a sense of obliga? on, there is no purpose â€Å"consis? ng either in the ac? on itself or in anything which it will gravel”. A mo? ve, being something that moves one to act, can be the sense of obliga? on, an ac? on make from a sense of obliga? on can and then have a mo? ve. 4. Avirtuous act is done from a desire that is intrinsically good. A moral act may be done from obliga? on.\r\n at that place can’t be an obliga? on to act virtuously, because we can yet â€Å"feel an obliga? on to act” or do something. We cannot, however, feel an obliga? on to act from a certain desire 5. It is a wrongdoing to expect moral philosophy to prove through with(predicate) argumenta? on that we ought to ful+ll our obliga? ons, because moral rightness â€Å"cannot be demonstrated, only apprehended directly by an act of moral thinking”. The sense of obliga? on is a topic of a moral thought or thoughts. clean-living philosophy can provide re-ec? on on the â€Å"immediacy of our knowledge of moral rightness” and the intui? ve recogni? on of the goodness of the virtues.\r\n'