Box-office reports this weekend show Slumdog Millionaire generating real heat, its the only one of the quintette Oscar nominees for Best Picture to crack the Top Ten. But that hasnt separate a backlash from kicking in. What was once the little boob tube that could is now the favorite movie to simulate a track at. Everything from accusing the filmmakers of exploiting the child actors in Mumbai by paying them crushed change on a film whose groundwide gross is $86 million so farto claims that the movie, from British director Danny Boyle, is final in India because real slumdwellers hate being called slumdogs. Then on that point are the critics who insist the film is far from all its zesty up to be. The arguments go like this (jump in if you agree or disagree): --The movie isnt an upper, its poverty porn, exploiting misery for fun and profit. --Its a tweed mans imagined India, not the real thing. --The movie shows the worst aspects of India and that is what the western human race likes to see. --The plot is impossible to believe.
The questions that girlish Jamal (Dev Patel) is asked on Indias version of Who Wants To Be a Millionaire correspond chronologically with traumas in a youthful boys life. --The quiz show theme sends the wrong message the final result is education and hard work, not a quick fix. --The movies pastime feels more like a filmmakers front than an honest cry from the heart about the human spirit. Do you buy into any of this? Do you think the backlashers have a point or are their criticisms just sour grapes?If you take to get a full e ssay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment