See Below

Unfair Trading Practices and the EU LawThe objective of the European experience is to establish a roughhewn merchandise with a spiffing level of combat and integrating of economic performance . The European Commission enacted some rules , so as to promote militantness maintain anti - competitive doings and thwart undertakings enjoying a paramount identify , from engaging in anti - competitive activities . The European Commission imposed these rules by article 82 ECHowever , in that location is no clear translation with regard to rife point Experts analyse controller on the basis of the harvest food commercialiseplace place , the br geographic market and the temporal cryptogram . The provisions of Article 82 EC do non keep back companies to be in a overriding identify , only if they prohibit the misapply of much(prenominal) congeal or the exploitation of dominance by companies and undertakingsDominant bureau thunder mug be construed , in the context of use of trade as a impersonate of considerable magnate , which is enjoyed by a exponentiation or undertaking , in to influence trade relating to a accompaniment product in a geographical market , such(prenominal) as the EU . Article 82 EC concerns the cry of a dominant speckle by companies thus , in the absence of such dominance there give nonice be no abuseThe ECJ open the principle of dominant position , for the scratch time , in the case of linked Brands . This case , which is practically referred to in the EC Competition law , covers the exposition of the market , the notion of a dominant position and some other aspects of abuse under Article 82 EC . The United Brands federation was alleged to comport ab employ its dominant position . This association imported unaged Chiquita brand of Latin American bananas into the EU . It supplied these unripe bananas to the hearty deal distributors in some(prenominal) Member States of the EU in large quantities . The whole bargain distributors purchased these bananas , from the go with , while they were putting special K and unripe . Subsequently , they used their own techniques to ripen them and cash in ones chips them to retailers .

In the year 1975 the European Commission came to the conclusion that the fellowship had violated Article 82 EC . The United Brands society challenged this finis of the Commission and contended that it did not enjoy dominance . hitherto , it denied the charges of having abused a dominant positionThe case was referred to the ECJ , which held that the company enjoyed a dominant position in the market . It defined the applicable market as the retail market in which the sale of bananas to consumers took place . The company did craft with distributors and not with retailers or consumers , which indicated a dominant position . moreover , it did not carry reveal any business basis in the retail market , but engaged in trade terms to consequence bananas to wholesale distributors . Therefore , the company had abused its dominant position . The Court based its decision on Article 82 EC , and held that the company had use its dominant position in the common market to prevent effective competition in the relevant market . further , it was held by the ECJ that the company had acted each of its...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper