unite States . They pay a vested financial interest in maintaining the status quoSecondly , we can learn a basic frugal principle by evaluating the Canadian system . That system has , in a large part , been able to pay for itself through and through with(predicate) the elimination of waste . With no to a greater extent than means tests or multiple filings to insurance companies necessary , billions of dollars is bear ond that can go more directly toward the health of the citizensThirdly , in a general coverage system people are much more likely to practice check care . Critics might swipe that people would abuse such a system . til now , the cost of system abuse is more than offset by the benefits of hang-up care . Preventive care spells money for a number of reasons . People take slight sick old age out of work , rent a longer and come apart working life and catch potential problems when they are little traumatic and expensive to contend with . Whether or not the U .S . moves to a single-payer system , a focus on preventive care is critical for the next .
Funding our own rising will mean maximizing the healthy lifespan of our workforceFourth , the Canadians have been able to revise their system as needed U .S . health policy should also be flexible . The political science must make sure that insurers are striking an trustworthy balance between profit making and the needs of the patient . The current Canadian focus on technol ogy and a seamless transition of medical inf! ormation has the potential to save millionsFinally , Canadians have chosen wisely to spend their tax dollars on health care , there is a great pay off care of resistance to all forms of taxation in the United States . This exists primarily because the public either disagrees as to what their money is creation played out on or perceives that there is a great deal of...If you want to get a panoptic essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment